KERALA CHITTIES ACT 1975 PDF
[Act 23 of ]. Preamble. An Act to define, amend and consolidate the law relating to chitties in the State of Kerala;. WHEREAS it is expedient to define, amend. RBI prepared a Draft Bill. The Kerala Chitties Act. The Chit Funds Act. The laws relating to chitties in force of Kerala State. appellant was that the plaintiff has violated the Kerala Chitties Act, and contended that there was no previous sanction Government as required under .
|Published (Last):||25 June 2012|
|PDF File Size:||3.19 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.15 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
That the inconsistency between the provisions of the two Acts is of such nature as to bring the two Acts into direct collision with each other and a situation is reached where it is impossible to obey the one without disobeying the other.
Vikram Singh and others [ All.
Giri, learned counsel for one of the private chitty firms, the judgment of this Court in Pt. Of Meetings of the General Body of Subscribers. Therefore, according to the learned counsel, the very text of Article makes it clear that a declaration of repugnance by a Court kerals both laws actually being in operation.
Where an intention to effect a repeal is attributed to a legislature then the same would, in our opinion, attract the 1957 of the saving found in Section 6 for the rules of construction embodied in the General Clauses Act are, so to speak, the basic assumptions on which statutes are drafted.
Transfer of rights of foreman when voidable. It is, therefore, clear that kerzla notification bringing an Act into force is not contemplated by Section 22 of the General Clauses Act.
Suffice to say that if Sub-section 1a sic of Section 4 is given effect to, a Foreman who has already got the registration under the Central Act and governed by the provisions of that Act would also be subjected to various provisions of the Kerala Act which are inconsistent and repugnant to the Central Act.
Even though the subsequent law made by Parliament does not expressly repeal a State law, even then, the State law will become void as soon as the subsequent law of Parliament creating repugnancy is made.
Until such notification is issued neither the Kerala Chitties Act, prevails in the State of Kerala as it has become void and has been repealed under Article 1nor the Central Chit Funds Act, as it is not notified till date. Provided that such repeal shall not affect in any manner the operation of those enactments in respect of chitties started before the commencement of this Act. Applying the tests enumerated hereinabove, we hold that the Kerala Chitties Act, became void on the making of the Chit Funds Act, on Provided that the chitty amount in the case of anyone chitty conducted by a foreman shall not exceed twenty-five thousand rupees: Section 1 2 of the said Act states that the Act extends to the whole of India, except the State of Jammu and Kashmir whereas Section 1 3 states that it shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint and different dates may be appointed for different States.
That Ordinance was for a temporary period. Recovery of amounts due from foreman. According to the learned counsel, keeping in view the provisions of Sections 1 34, 89 and 90 of the Act and absent framing of the Rules by the State Government in terms of Section 89, making of the central law cannot be the test for determining repugnancy.
Thus, the actual bringing into force of the Central Act is not a relevant circumstance insofar as the legislative business of the State Legislature is concerned. Article ekrala enunciates the normal rule that in the event of a conflict between a Union and a State law in the concurrent field, the former prevails over the latter. Insolvency or liquidation a bar to winding up proceedings.
KERALA CHITTIES ACT PDF DOWNLOAD
Saving of some chitties. State of Karnataka reported in Xhitties. Where such is the position, the inconsistency is demonstrated not by a detailed comparison of provisions of the two statutes but by the mere existence of the two pieces of legislation. Applying the tests laid down in the above judgments of this Court, when a State law is repealed expressly or by implication by a Union law, Section 6 of the General Clauses Act applies as to things done under the State law which are so repealed, so that transactions under the State law before the repeal are saved as also any rights and liabilities arising under the State Act, prior to the enactment of the Central Act.
Dowry death — set ablaze The demand of dowry raised by the accused persons later for television and cooler could not be satisfied by the family of the deceased for financial limitations upon the death of father of the deceased.
Section 4 – Prohibition of invitation for subscription except under certain conditions 1 Where previous sanction is required by section 3 for starting and conducting a chitty, no person shall issue or publish any notice, circular, prospectus, proposal or other document inviting the public to subscribe for tickets in any such chitty or containing the terms and conditions of any such chitty unless such notice, circular, prospectus, proposal or other document contains a statement that the previous sanction required by section 3 has been obtained, together with the particulars of such sanction.
Supreme Court nullifies Kerala Chit Fund Act
This naturally means that where both the State and Parliament occupy the field contemplated by the Concurrent List then the Act passed by Parliament being prior in point of time will prevail and consequently the State Act will have to yield to the Central Act.
Copy of winding up order to be filed with the Registrar. Such repugnancy may also arise where both laws operate in the same field and the two cannot possibly stand together, e. As stated, Parliamentary Legislation has supremacy as provided in Article 1 and 2. Section 4 — Prohibition of invitation for subscription except under certain conditions 1 Where previous sanction is required by section 3 for starting and conducting a chitty, no person shall issue or publish any notice, circular, prospectus, proposal or other document inviting the public to subscribe for tickets in any such chitty or containing the terms and conditions of any such chitty unless such notice, circular, prospectus, proposal or other document contains a statement that the previous sanction required by section 3 has been obtained, together with the particulars of such sanction.
Suits stayed on winding up order. Secondly, so far as the Concurrent List is concerned, both Parliament and the State Legislatures are entitled to legislate in regard to any of the Entries appearing therein, but that is subject to the condition laid down by Article 1 discussed above.
Of Meetings of the General Body of Subscribers. Cowburn  37 C. Suits stayed on winding up order. Provided further that no person shall be entitled to start kerala chitties act new chitty of the class specified in this sub-section till the expiry of the term of such a chitty already started. Such incompatibility has to be ascertained from a consideration of all relevant provisions of the new law and mere absence of a saving clause by itself is not material.
To hold otherwise would mean bypassing the legislative will of the Parliament expressed by passing the Act. Recovery of amounts due from foreman. Section 6 – Variola In every chitty there shall be a variola in duplicate signed by each of the subscribers or by a person authorized in writing by the subscriber in that behalf and such signature shall be attested by at least one witness.
Learned counsel submitted that the said words indicate that the entire State Act is not rendered void under Article 1 merely by enactment of a Central law.